Open Question

Which imaging-biomarker findings established under histologic WHO grades remain valid under the molecular WHO CNS5 taxonomy?

Evidence grade: EXPERT-CONSENSUS — Reflects expert consensus rather than definitive trial evidence.

Why it matters

A large fraction of imaging-outcome evidence predates CNS5; correlations may be miscalibrated to obsolete tumor classes, silently distorting current practice.

Conflicting evidence

CNS5 improves biological precision but legacy imaging cohorts are rarely re-annotated and re-tested.

What would resolve it

Re-annotate legacy imaging cohorts to CNS5 molecular entities; re-estimate imaging-biomarker associations; report which survive.

Open in the interactive atlas →

About this page

Curated and maintained by Resonant Labs. Reviewed by Claims are synthesized from the cited literature and graded per the Atlas methodology (about the Atlas). Last updated 2026-07-01.

This is an educational research resource from Resonant Labs, not clinical advice. Evidence grades and controversies are summarized from the literature and may change as the field evolves.