Open Question

Does automated volumetric response assessment change trial conclusions or clinical decisions versus bidimensional RANO?

Evidence grade: MODERATE — Supported by moderate evidence.

Why it matters

Segmentation is near-solved technically, but whether volumetrics actually alter response classification and outcomes is unproven; effort has outpaced evidence of value.

Conflicting evidence

BraTS-driven segmentation is robust, but volumetric RANO is not standard and marginal Dice gains lack demonstrated clinical translation.

What would resolve it

Re-analyze completed trials with automated volumetrics vs bidimensional RANO; test whether response category and hazard estimates change.

Open in the interactive atlas →

About this page

Curated and maintained by Resonant Labs. Reviewed by Claims are synthesized from the cited literature and graded per the Atlas methodology (about the Atlas). Last updated 2026-07-01.

This is an educational research resource from Resonant Labs, not clinical advice. Evidence grades and controversies are summarized from the literature and may change as the field evolves.