Field Gap

Under-studied area: Structured reporting existence vs calibration

Over-represented in the literature

NI-RADS/TI-RADS adoption and description are well covered

Under-represented

Prospective calibration of category-to-malignancy-risk across populations is under-studied

Why the gap exists

Publishing a reporting system is a consensus act; calibrating it needs prospective outcome data

Open in the interactive atlas →

About this page

Curated and maintained by Resonant Labs. Reviewed by Claims are synthesized from the cited literature and graded per the Atlas methodology (about the Atlas). Last updated 2026-07-14.

This is an educational research resource from Resonant Labs, not clinical advice. Evidence grades and controversies are summarized from the literature and may change as the field evolves.