Field Gap

Under-studied area: Validation regime

Over-represented in the literature

Internal cross-validation and single-institution train/test splits reported as evidence of performance

Under-represented

Prospective, multi-scanner, multi-vendor external validation with pre-registered thresholds; calibration and decision-curve analysis

Why the gap exists

External data is costly and often shows performance drop; incentives reward high internal AUC and publication over robustness

Open in the interactive atlas →

About this page

Curated and maintained by Resonant Labs. Reviewed by Claims are synthesized from the cited literature and graded per the Atlas methodology (about the Atlas). Last updated 2026-07-01.

This is an educational research resource from Resonant Labs, not clinical advice. Evidence grades and controversies are summarized from the literature and may change as the field evolves.