Field Gap

Under-studied area: Validation regime

Over-represented in the literature

Internal cross-validation and single-institution train/test splits reported as evidence of performance

Under-represented

Prospective, multi-scanner, multi-vendor external validation with pre-registered thresholds; calibration and decision-curve analysis

Why the gap exists

External data is costly and often shows performance drop; incentives reward high internal AUC and publication over robustness

Open in the interactive atlas →

About this page

Curated and maintained by Resonant Labs. Editorial lead: Claims are synthesized from the cited literature and graded per the Atlas methodology (about the Atlas). Page generated 2026-10-02. This is not a new clinical review date.

This is an educational research resource from Resonant Labs, not clinical advice. Atlas assessments are heuristic, not probabilities or formal GRADE ratings. Findings are summarized from the literature and may change as the field evolves.